Legal Opinion · Concurrence

The People v. Thomas Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2017No. 22Published

1ConcurrenceFahey, J.

I agree with the majority that defendant’s waiver of his Antommarchi rights was valid. I respectfully disagree, however, with the conclusion that defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s Sandoval ruling is not preserved for appellate review.

*25Before trial, the People requested permission to impeach defendant’s credibility if he chose to testify with, among other things, the facts underlying two juvenile delinquency adjudications. Defense counsel objected during the Sandoval hearing, arguing that the court should “exclude them simply because they are juvenile offenses,” and because “an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GreerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. PradoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API