Legal Opinion

Camden Board of Education v. Alexander

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 12, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

854 A.2d 342 (2004)

181 N.J. 187

CAMDEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent,

v.

Nelson ALEXANDER; Juan Diaz; Herminio Febres; David Sims; Lawrence Hackett; James Bradley; Wesley Conston; William Hedgebeth; Andre Moody; Angel Pagan; Ernesto Santiago; Larry Williams; Derek Copeland; Robert Hawkins; Charles Smith and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 8, 2003.

Decided August 12, 2004.

Thomas M. Toman, Jr., New York City, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Murray…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Dissent.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API