Legal Opinion

Mullin v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 30, 2005No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0189PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This is a legal malpractice case. Defendants/appellants, Bradford Brown, Arthur Chapa, Richard Fields, and Edward Linden, admitted they were negligent in having failed to timely file a petition contesting the will and trust of Ralph Mullin, plaintiff Andrew Mullin’s grandfather. The trial court denied appellants’ motions for directed verdict, made at the close of Andrew’s case and at the close of evidence. The jury determined that Andrew would have successfully contested the will and trust and awarded him $2,937,125 in damages. 1 Following the ver- diet,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. United States v. William A. Nash, Jr. and David LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API