Legal Opinion
Muramato v. Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1950No. Adm. No. 159-188PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Exceptions to libel.
The suit is for damages resulting from injuries alleged to have been sustained by the libelant while employed as a seaman aboard the S. S. Tomas Guardia on or about November 1, 1945, and for maintenance and cure. At the time the Guardia was owned by the United States and managed by respondent, Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc. as general agents under a General Agency contract similar to the contract in Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 69 S.Ct. 1317, 93 L.Ed. 1692, 1949 A.M.C. 1031.
The respondent was not the employer of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fink v. Shepard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Brown v. . Cleveland Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Standard Accident Insurance v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- F. & T. DEVELOPMENT CO. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Bell v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956