ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INS. CO. INC. v. Dal-Worth Tank Co.

The parties’ motions for rehearing are overruled. We withdraw our per curiam opinion issued February 13,1998, and substitute the following in its place.

Of the numerous issues raised by all parties in this case, we address only whether the court of appeals erred in its rulings concerning a Mary Carter agreement, damages for loss of credit reputation, whether defendant acted knowingly, prejudgment interest, and attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the court of appeals.

The facts are fully set out in the court of appeals’ opinion, 917 S.W.2d 29, 36-40, and we…