Legal Opinion

Dangel v. Offset Printing, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

In this action of tort, demurrers to the declaration were sustained, and the plaintiff appealed. There were two substantially similar counts. It will be sufficient to consider merely the first count, which alleged that the defendant “well knowing that it had no claim against the plaintiff personally, nevertheless maliciously and without probable cause sued out a writ on October 7, 1959, against the plaintiff and on that writ, wrongfully attached the goods, effects and credits of the plaintiff and wrongfully used said legal process to deprive the plaintiff of the said goods, effects and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. GinisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Zinn v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Jacobs v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Swartz v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Hamilburgh v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Drill Parts and Service Co. v. Joy Mfg.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. James D. Sullivan v. Edward J. Choquette, Jonathan G. Wells Iii, Harvey Beit and T. Francis KelleherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974
  5. Cuddy v. SweeneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API