Jacobs v. Mann
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s
declaration was sustained with an order that no amendment be allowed. The plaintiff’s appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer is before us rightly. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 96. Morrill v. Crawford, 278 Mass. 250. Gallo v. Foley, 299 Mass. 1.
The action is in tort and the' declaration is as follows: *259“Plaintiff says that on or about the 31st day of July, 1934 the defendant, in order to injure the plaintiff in his profession and to disgrace, degrade, defame and prosecute him, with express malice and without probable cause, of his own initiation,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norris v. DoniphanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Malone v. BelcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Rosenblum v. GinisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Gallo v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Joyce v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Massachusetts Society of Optometrists v. WaddickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.