Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2017No. 12089611P; A157914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

Defendant Mark Nooth, superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution (the state), appeals a post-conviction court judgment concluding that petitioner’s trial attorney provided inadequate representation during his criminal trial for sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and granting petitioner post-conviction relief. The state argues that key evidence offered by petitioner in support of his claim of inadequate assistance of counsel would have been inadmissible at his criminal trial and that the post-conviction court erred in granting relief based at least in part on that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PlueardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API