Legal Opinion

Burford v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

845 S.W.2d 204 (1992)

Daryl K. BURFORD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Tennessee, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

December 21, 1992.

Comer L. Donnell, Dist. Public Defender, Lebanon, for appellant.

Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen. & Reporter, and Kimbra R. Spann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for appellee.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this case, the only issue presented for our review is whether the petitioner's claim for post-conviction relief is barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102. Clearly, the post-conviction claim here was filed more…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API