Legal Opinion

Ramapo River Reserve Homeowners Ass'n v. Borough of Oakland

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 13, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

896 A.2d 459 (2006)

186 N.J. 439

RAMAPO RIVER RESERVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Baker Residential, LP, Third Party Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 2005.

Decided March 13, 2006.

Brian M. Chewcaskie, Fort Lee, argued the cause for appellant (Gittleman, Muhlstock & Chewcaskie, attorneys).

Lawrence H. Wertheim argued the cause for respondent (Himelman, Wertheim & Geller, attorneys).

2Opinion of the Court · Rivera-SotoJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal requires that we harmonize, as a matter of public policy, the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Saint Peter's University Hospital v. LacySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. In Re the Adoption of a Child by W.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  4. Ramapo River Reserve Homeowners Ass'n v. Borough of OaklandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Briarglen II Condominium Ass'n v. Township of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API