Ramapo River Reserve Homeowners Ass'n v. Borough of Oakland
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
896 A.2d 459 (2006)
186 N.J. 439
RAMAPO RIVER RESERVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Baker Residential, LP, Third Party Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 29, 2005.
Decided March 13, 2006.
Brian M. Chewcaskie, Fort Lee, argued the cause for appellant (Gittleman, Muhlstock & Chewcaskie, attorneys).
Lawrence H. Wertheim argued the cause for respondent (Himelman, Wertheim & Geller, attorneys).
2Opinion of the Court · Rivera-SotoJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal requires that we harmonize, as a matter of public policy, the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Saint Peter's University Hospital v. LacySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In Re the Adoption of a Child by W.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Ramapo River Reserve Homeowners Ass'n v. Borough of OaklandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Briarglen II Condominium Ass'n v. Township of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.