Legal Opinion

Ramapo River Reserve Homeowners Ass'n v. Borough of Oakland

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 13, 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal requires that we harmonize, as a matter of public policy, the provisions of the Municipal Land Use Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -99, governing municipal development agreements— “written agreements] between a municipality and a developer relating to the planned development,]” N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.2l.— with the obligation set forth in the Municipal Services Act requiring that a municipality either provide or reimburse the cost of certain enumerated services to a statutorily defined “qualified private community[,]” N.J.S.A. 40:67-23.2e and -23.3. On the strength of Briarglen II Condo.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Saint Peter's University Hospital v. LacySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. In Re the Adoption of a Child by W.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  4. Briarglen II Condominium Ass'n v. Township of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. In Re the Civil Commitment of J.M.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. KafilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Tp. of White v. Castle Ridge Devt.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. M.E.F. v. A.B.F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API