Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kelly

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1992No. 91-CV-1420PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Section 412 of Title IV (the “District Charter”) of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, as amended,1 grants to the Council of the District of Columbia (the “Council”) limited power through the use of resolutions to approve or disapprove certain proposed actions of the Mayor and other District governmental entities. Specifically, as pertinent to the matter now before us, section 412, as amended and codified in D.C.Code § 1-229 (1992),2 provides:(a) The Council, to discharge the powers and duties imposed herein, shall pass acts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Altagracia Sanchez v. Office of the State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  2. Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Newport Township v. MargalisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. American Council of Life Insurers v. District of Columbia Health Benefit Exchange AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. RDP Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API