Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
The specific issue before us in this appeal is whether the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the “Board”) acted lawfully when it rejected appellants’ proposed initiative measure on the ground that the measure would authorize, or have the effect of authorizing, dis*92crimination prohibited by the Human Rights Act, and therefore was not a proper subject of initiative. As will be seen, however, the underlying issues are much broader and more fundamental. They concern (1) the allocation of the power to enact laws governing the District of Columbia, within…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. DebruhlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Aziken v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brian Gill v. Rodney Van NostrandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.