Chautauqua Institution v. Zimmerman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Sater, Judge. Action at law by the Chautauqua Institution against John L. Zimmerman, John M. Good, and the Popular Education Publishing Company. From the judgment, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, on May 9, 1910, instituted this action in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio to recover $12,224.75 damages alleged to have been sustained by it from divers breaches by the defendants of the stipulations of a contract in writing entered into on April 24, 1902, between the plaintiff (called therein the first party) and the Floral Publishing Company (called the second party), and of other agreements which supplemented and enlarged it. So far as they are material to the question before us, the provisions of the first…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Mayes v. Paul Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. Pennsylvania & Lake Erie Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Lemmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932