State v. Gonzales-Bejarano
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶1 Defendant Enrique Valentin Gonzales-Bejarano appeals from his convictions: two second-degree felonies, four third-degree felonies, and a class A misdemeanor. Specifically, he argues that he did not receive his constitutionally guaranteed right to the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel had a conflict of interest, failed to object to certain testimony, and failed to move for a directed verdict with regard to two of the charges. We conclude that Defendant has not demonstrated any prejudice resulting from the alleged conflict of interest or hearsay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024