Legal Opinion

Durrani v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 26, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0607 (CKK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

In this action brought pro se under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, plaintiff seeks to compel the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services “to correct his citizenship records as requested on January 19, 2008,” to reflect his status as a naturalized citizen. Complaint at 1. He then seeks “a duplicate copy of his citizenship certificate” and monetary damages. Id. at 2. Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Dkt. No. 18] and plaintiff cross moves for summary judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API