Hill v. Adams Express Co.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Paekee, J.

This is the third review of this ease, and a repetition of the general matters of fact already recited in previous reports of it, which will be cited, is therefore unnecessary. The first time it went off in this court on questions of evidence. 45 Vroorn 338. After a second trial it was again brought to this court on certiorari and the judgment of the District Court affirmed on the ground that the limited liability clause contained in defendant’s receipt could not be enforced against Miss Ferris as the actual plaintiff in the suit, because no…