Legal Opinion

Paul v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 23, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to Hudson Circuit.'

1Opinion of the Court

*443The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

On July 24th, 1902, the plaintiff shipped live stock from Aberdeen, Maryland, to Canfield & Co., Harrison, N. J. The contract was made between the plaintiff and the Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company and was what is called the “uniform live stock contract.” It is the same form of contract which was considered by this court in Lewis v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., ante p. 132. The contract provided that the live stock had been received by the carrier for itself and on behalf of connecting carriers upon certain terms and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Ball v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horelick v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Berry v. Penna. RR Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Dee v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hill v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API