Legal Opinion

Hale v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1964No. 334PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellant, Lula Hale, brought this action for personal injuries after she slipped and fell upon ice on a public sidewalk in the City of Anchorage in December 1958. In a brief oral decision at the end of the trial the judge found that appellant was contrib-utorily negligent, and directed entry of judgment for the city. More than one year after the trial, a formal judgment was entered by a successor judge — the trial judge in the meantime having been retired for disability.

Before reaching the main issue in this case, there are two other points to consider. Appellant first…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hamilton v. Laclede Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Pollastrine v. SeveranceAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Strappelli v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Geagley v. City of BedfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kremer v. Carr's Food Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bolt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Richard D. Hollinger, and Stella Hollinger v. United States of America, Richard D. Hollinger, and Stella Hollinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API