Legal Opinion
B. P. J. v. West Virginia State Board of Education
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 1, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00316Unknown
1Opinion
CHARLESTON DIVISION B. P. J., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-00316 WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Proposed Intervenor Lainey Armistead’s Motion to Intervene. [ECF No. 94]. Ms. Armistead has moved to intervene both (1) as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) and (2) permissively under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b). For the reasons that follow, Ms. Armistead does not meet the requirements to intervene as a matter of right, but the court will allow her to intervene…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Gretchen Stuart v. Janice HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Alt v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Partington v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. University of North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017