Legal Opinion

State v. Denny

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 2, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 1660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

We are required to determine in this criminal appeal whether the removal of encumbered property from a restaurant subjected appellant to the criminal sanctions of A.R.S. § 44-1219.

Appellant owned two-thirds of the stock of three Arizona corporations which in turn owned and operated three restaurants: namely, Neptune’s Table, Neptune’s Fish and Chowder and Neptune’s East.

In December 1974, appellant removed certain wall decorations from Neptune’s Table in Phoenix, Arizona, and took them to Torrance, California, where they were installed in another restaurant in which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Meason v. Ralston Purina Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Town of Scottsdale v. State ex rel. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State of Arizona v. James Darrell JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API