Legal Opinion

Dobronski v. Baid

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 29, 2024No. 2:24-cv-10297Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARK W. DOBRONSKI, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-10297 v. Hon. George Caram Steeh RATAN BAID and VIVEK BAID, d/b/a ELD MANDATE, Defendants. _____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 15) Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motion is denied. BACKGROUND FACTS Plaintiff Mark W. Dobronski, appearing pro se, brought this action pursuant to the Telephone Consumer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API