Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Eastern Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1956No. 36,758PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming an order of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission.

The primary question upon this appeal is whether the Railroad and Warehouse Commission, in the absence of the holding of at least one public hearing-in the city of Minneapolis as required by M. 8. A. 219.39, had jurisdiction to issue an order apportioning between respondent railroads and the city the cost of reconstructing an existing grade separation bridge over the respondents’ tracks in said city, when the need for such reconstruction was admitted by both the respondents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. M. St. P. S. S. M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. DeRoche v. All American Bottling Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API