Roosevelt v. Roosevelt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, J.
Defendant James Roosevelt (hereinafter defendant) appeals from the judgment of the court below denying his claim to exemption from execution.
On June 8, 1954, defendant and plaintiff Romelle S. Roosevelt (hereinafter plaintiff), who were then married, entered into a written contract entitled “Separation Agreement.” The separation agreement recited the parties’ desire and intent “to settle and adjust, as between themselves, their respective present and future property rights, together with questions pertaining to support and maintenance of Second Party [plaintiff].... ”
By its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hollman v. HollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of Marion E.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re DalaimoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1988
- Hollman v. HollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985