Legal Opinion

Ruffin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1987No. 83-640, 83-733Published

1Opinion of the Court

524 A.2d 685 (1987)

Antone D. RUFFIN, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

James R. SHAW, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Nos. 83-640, 83-733.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued December 11, 1984.

Submitted December 11, 1984.

Decided April 16, 1987.

Bruce Kleinman, for appellant Antone D. Ruffin.

Martin S. Echter, Washington, D.C., for appellant James R. Shaw.

Kenneth J. Melilli, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before MACK, FERREN and ROGERS, Associate Judges.

Argued in…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API