Legal Opinion
Huntoon v. City of Quincy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 7, 1965PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.
These are two actions of contract brought, respectively, by Earl P. Huntoon, Jr. (Huntoon) and Dante DiBona (DiBona) to recover salaries allegedly owed but not paid to them by the city of Quincy (the city) subsequent to October 16, 1960. Each case was submitted on stipulated facts. The judge correctly treated each as a case stated. Rogers v. Attorney Gen. 347 Mass. 126,130. Judgments were ordered for the city. The plaintiffs 2 appealed.
In October, 1960, the plaintiffs held permanent appointments in the police department of the city. Huntoon was a sergeant. DiBona was a patrolman. Their…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Whitney v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Mayor v. Judge of First District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Rogers v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spence v. ReederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- National Medical Care, Inc. v. ZigelbaumMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Silverio v. Municipal Court of the City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Dickson v. Riverside Iron Works, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Police Commissioner v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.