Legal Opinion

Copadis v. Haymond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 7, 1946No. 3584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

This intersectional collision occurred under conditions of weather, travel, visibility, and absence of obstructions which may be described as favorable. “There was evidence from which the jury might have found that either or both drivers were negligent. There was also evidence from which they could have found that either or both were free from fault. Under these circumstances the issue of their due care was for the jury.” Bissonnette v. Cheverette, 87 N. H. 211, 213. The causative effect of the plaintiff’s failure to “give timely signal with his horn” (R. L., c. 119, s. 16; Pickard v. Morris,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Gendron v. GliddenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  3. Campbell v. Portsmouth Hotel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  4. Bissonnette v. CheveretteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  5. Pickard v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torres Rodríguez v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  2. Homen v. CabralMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
  3. McConchie v. Samsung ElectronicsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API