Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Portsmouth Hotel Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 3, 1941No. 3241PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

While in express terms only the stolen car was left in the defendant’s charge, the circumstances were such that it could fairly be found that the defendant assumed to take in charge the contents of the car appropriate for the traveling purposes of the plaintiffs as well as the car itself. They were travelers, and stopping over night at the defendant’s hotel as they did, they might reasonably be expected to leave in the car such accessories, equipment and baggage as they had no occasion to use while at the hotel. It might therefore be found that the contract of bailment included both the car…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. North Terminal Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Rogers v. MurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Allright Texas, Inc. v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Davidson v. RamsbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Nolan v. Auto TransportersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Ampco Auto Parks, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API