Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Kuck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1904No. Gen. No. 4,275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria County; the Hon. Theodore N. Green, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this action brought by Herman Kuck against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company to recover damages for injuries received by Kuck while in the employ of the company, and which his declaration attributed to the negligence of the company, plaintiff recovered a verdict and a judgment for $1,999, the full amount of the amended ad damnum in the declaration. This is an appeal by the railway company from said judgment.

If plaintiff was entitled to recoven he was only entitled to compensation. The only instructions given the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Consolidated Railway Co. v. PuntenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. La Porte v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Freeman Wire & Iron Co. v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hopkins v. WhelanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  3. Crawford v. ZacharyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API