Legal Opinion

Freeman Wire & Iron Co. v. Collins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum.—Action for injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Alonzo D. Wildbrman, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scofield

Appellee was engaged in the manufacture of barbed wire, as one of appellant’s employes, and at the time when he received the injury complained of, was working with a machine which attached the barbs to the wire. A chain which runs the upper part of the machine suddenly broke, and the wire which was passing through the machine, released from its tension, struck appellee in the eye and seriously impaired his sight. At least this is the claim made by appellee, who also contends that the chain which gave way was old and worn out, and that appellant was guilty of negligence in suffering it to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keightlinger v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Waldron v. MarcierIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Porte v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KuckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Haisler v. HaydenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API