Legal Opinion

(PC) J'Weial v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 20, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00712Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XAVIER LUMAR J’WEIAL, No. 2:21-cv-00712-WBS-SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights matter under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 19 matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33) is before the court on remand from the 21 assigned district judge for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API