Legal Opinion

Hull v. Fitzstephens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 1989No. 86-0601C; CA A48050Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendants appeal from the judgment in this action arising out of their sale of a mobile Pickwick Potatoe Oven to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs pleaded five claims, all of which centered on defendants’ alleged misrepresentation that necessary licenses from the state Health Division and the City of Portland were obtainable. The trial court entered a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor on their negligent misrepresentation claim. Defendants contend in each of their four assignments only that the trial court erred in the damages award. We affirm.

Defendants’ first and second assignments are that damages were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fort Hill Lumber Co. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Jack Jacobs, Inc. v. Allied Systems Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API