Legal Opinion

Byrne v. LeBlond

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur M. Schack, J.

*878After settlement of the instant case by plaintiffs incoming attorneys, Michael A. Zimmerman & Associates, EC., plaintiffs outgoing attorneys, Rovegno and Taylor, EC., move for an order to determine the division of legal fees between the incoming and outgoing attorneys. Mr. Zimmerman disputes Rovegno and Taylor’s motion, claiming that the outgoing attorneys were discharged for cause and not entitled to any fee, or in the alternative, if discharged without cause, Rovegno and Taylor should have their fee determined on a quantum meruit basis. For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Byrne v. LeblondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API