Legal Opinion

Wood v. Cross

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1910No. 16,406Published

Appeal from Stanton district court; William H. Thompson, judge.

1Per curiam

The trial court held a tax deed of the defendant valid. The plaintiffs appeal. It was a compromise tax deed more than five years old. The first objection to its validity is ruled by the recent case of Gibson v. Cockrum, 81 Kan. 772, where it was held, upon a similar state of'facts, that it- will be presumed that the- purchaser was required to pay the delinquent taxes for the other years as a condition precedent to the compromise, and that they were paid when the certificate issued. The second objection is that there was no authority for the assignment because the order of the board was made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Baughman v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Gibson v. CockrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API