Legal Opinion
Hildreth v. Thibodeau
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided July 31, 1902No. 1,487PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In Equity. Suit for specific performance.
1Opinion of the Court
COLT, Circuit Judge.
This is a bill for the specific performance of the following agreement:
“Whereas, Herbert L. Hildreth, of Boston, candy manufacturer, is desirous of having perfected and manufactured a certain machine or machines for use in the manufacture of candy, and especially for sizing, shaping, cutting, wrapping, and packing; also the pulling of molasses candy; and whereas, I, Charles Thibodeau, being a skilled mechanic, and desirous of entering the employ of said Hildreth for the purpose of constructing, improving, and perfecting such machinery: Now, therefore, in consideration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Milkman v. OrdwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Morss v. ElmendorfNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Kempshall v. StoneNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
3Cited by6 opinions
- Velsicol Corp. v. HymanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
- Thibodeau v. HildrethCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Ryan v. MartinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.