Legal Opinion
Maysey v. Henkel Corporation
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided December 17, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00108Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-00108-GNS-HBB NATHANIEL EDWARD MAYSEY PLAINTIFF v. HENKEL CORPORATION; HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA; and NEMAK USA, INC. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 134). The motion is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Nemak USA Inc. (“Nemak”) die casts aluminum automobile parts. (Byrd Dep. 14:5, Oct. 30, 2018, DN 134-3; Pl.’s Mem. Supp. Resp. Def.’s Mot.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.