Wirebounds Patents Co. v. Saranac Automatic Mach. Cor.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
The three patents in suit relate to two machines and a method for producing wirebound boxes. These were issued February 9, 1915, to In-wood and Lavenberg, and are No. 1,128,144 for “combined carriage and former for wire-bound box machines,” application filed October 14,1904, referred to hereinafter as tbe workholder patent; No. 1,128,145, for “means for making box blanks,” application filed October 27, 1904, referred to hereinafter as stapling machine patent; and No. 1,128,252, for “method of making boxes,” application filed April 21, 1914, hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1923
- Victor Talking MacH. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Wirebounds Patents Co. v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wirebounds Patents Co. v. H. R. Gibbons Box Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Wirebounds Patents Co. v. Saranac Automatic MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933