Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 31, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-5241PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT F. COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendant, Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Orkin”), moves this Court for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., restricting its obligation for any termite damage to the home of plaintiffs, Herman Johnson and Joyce Johnson, to re-treatment of said property pursuant to the Subterranean Termite Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) entered into by Orkin and the Johnsons. This motion is GRANTED. 1
BACKGROUND
On July 12, 1988, Orkin and Herman Johnson entered into the Agreement covering property located at 4560 Lennox Boulevard in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- One-O-One Enterprises, Inc. v. Richard E. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Tweedel v. BrasseauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Omnitech International, Inc. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Palmer v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- Conkling v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Groth v. Orkin Exterminating Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.