Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Mungiven

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 8, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass for assault and battery.

1Opinion of the CourtParkhurst, J.

The case is before this court upon the defendant’s bill of exceptions duly prosecuted after verdict for the plaintiff, and denial by the trial judge of defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The declaration is in trespass for assault and battery, and declares as follows: — “For that the said defendant, at Providence, on, to-wit, the 14th day of May, A. D. 1910, with force and arms, a violent assault in and upon the body of the plaintiff did then and there make, and him the plaintiff, did then and there with like force and arms, beat, bruise, wound and evil entreat, and other wrongs to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  2. City of Pueblo v. GriffinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Irby v. WildeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Burton v. HolleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  5. Shultz v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Varley v. MotylSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API