Hill v. State

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

William N. Hill (Hill) appeals his conviction of one count of child molesting, deviate *375sexual conduct, a class B felony,1 for which he was sentenced to a presumptive ten year prison term. Hill contends his conviction was in error, stating two grounds for review. We restate the issues as follows:(1) Did trial court's entry result in an ap-pealable final judgment?(2) Did sufficient evidence exist to support Hill's conviction of child molesting?

We affirm.

Hill was initially charged, by information, with four counts of child molesting.2 These charges arose from an incident…