Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Mansfield Steel Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant in the Detroit justice’s court, and upon trial of the case judgment of no cause of action was rendered. Defendant made no claim of set-off or recoupment. Plaintiffs took an appeal to the Wayne circuit, and two days after the appeal was perfected, and before appearance by defendant, filed' a discontinuance and gave notice thereof to defendant. No court order of discontinuance was asked for or granted. Five days after such discontinuance plaintiffs again sued defendant, on the identical claim, in the Detroit justice’s court and upon trial had judgment. In the justice’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. WeiseMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas Gemmell, Inc. v. Svea Fire & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  2. Lucedale Commercial Co. v. StrengthMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Goin v. ChuteOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Murphy v. Frank P. Miller CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Talbot & Meier v. Board of Education, District. No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API