Stults Eagle Drug Co. v. Luke
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The Stults Eagle Drug Company, the owner and operator of a drug store in the city of Phoenix, by this proceeding seeks to enjoin and restrain the State Tax Commission from enforcing that portion of chapter 78, Laws 1935, making it the duty of the Tax Commission to collect a luxury tax, “for the purpose of raising public money to provide unemployment and welfare relief” (art. 2, § 1), on the plaintiff’s sales of cosmetics, toilet preparations, cigars, cigarettes, chewing tobacco, playing cards, and golf equipment. The ground upon which the relief is asked is that the law is in conflict with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Society for Savings v. CoiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Ingels v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lionel's Cigar Store v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Gila Meat Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- America West Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.