Legal Opinion

Martin v. Knox Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 2, 1991No. 91-5852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Opinion of

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Blackmun joins,

respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

On November 4, 1991, the Court applied its recently amended Rule 39.8 to eight petitions filed by James L. Martin. Instead of simply denying those certiorari petitions on the ground that they lacked merit, the Court denied Martin leave to proceed informa pauperis on the ground that the petitions were repetitive and frivolous. Zatko v. California, ante, p. 16. I dissented from that action, in part, because drawing distinctions between those…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. U.S. Cutting Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Haddrick Byrd v. Robert ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Haddrick Byrd v. Robert ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Phyllis Nairn v. Killeen I.S.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API