McMahon v. McMahon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
70 Cal.App.2d 126 (1945)
MARY ELIZABETH McMAHON, Respondent,
v.
LEO CHARLES McMAHON, Appellant.
Civ. No. 14888.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.
July 10, 1945.
Chris Wilson for Appellant.
Leo Friedman for Respondent.
MOORE, P. J.
The sole question for decision is whether the court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion to set aside the order of his default.
On October 18, 1944, defendant was served with the summons and copy of the complaint in this action for divorce and on the same day filed his voluntary appearance, stipulated that the action might be heard as a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Scheibe v. ScheibeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Rilcoff v. RilcoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mcmahon v. McmahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilterdink v. WilterdinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kromm v. KrommCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Boken v. BokenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976