Legal Opinion

Stearman v. Miranda

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1964No. 7250PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

Appellants were defendants in a suit arising out of an accident involving two trucks. Plaintiff was a passenger in one of the trucks and defendants were the drivers of the trucks and the employer of one of the drivers. Plaintiff received a Verdict and Judgment from which the driver of 'one of the trucks and his employer have appealed. The driver of the truck in which plaintiff was riding has not appealed.

Appellants ask a new trial on the grounds that there was no evidence to support certain instructions; that certain instructions were inconsistent, and that the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. MontoyaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Figueroa v. MajorsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Gray v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McDowell v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brand v. JH Rose Trucking CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. ChapmanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harmon v. SzramaArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Worthington v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API