Legal Opinion

Head v. Selleck

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided September 26, 1901No. 502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

This action was brought by for-ign attachment against nonresident defendants in the state court. The garnishee was served on August 22, 1900, and the writ was returned on the first Tuesday of September. Defendants’ petition for removal does not allege ignorance of the pendency of the action before the return day. They were not personally served with notice, and did not appear at that time. On October 10, 1900, the bond on petition to remove was executed by defendants, and on November 12, 1900, the counsel for defendants filed said petition for removal to this court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Security Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  4. Collins v. StottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Toccoa v. MarchbanksDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919
  2. Elms v. CraneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Linahan v. LinahanConnecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API