Legal Opinion

Michael Kingsley v. Stan Hendrickson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 2015No. 12-3639PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. On June 22, 2015, the Court vacated our judgment and remanded the ease to us for further proceedings. Pursuant to our Circuit Rule 54, the parties now have submitted statements of their respective positions. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we now vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for a new trial.

A

We assume familiarity with the decision of the Supreme Court, Kingsley v. Hendrickson, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2466, 192 L.Ed.2d 416 (2015), and with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Taylor v. BarkesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ana Sandoval v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. David Hopper v. Phil PlummerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Zimmerman v. DoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Anthony Zimmerman v. Jeffrey DoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Apkarian, Quentin v. McallisterDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API