Legal Opinion

Hopton v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 20, 2020No. 3:18-cv-05435Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TIMOTHY HOPTON, Case No. 18-cv-05435-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. No. 18, 29 Commissioner of Social Security, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Timothy Hopton seeks social security benefits for mental impairments, including 14 obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, major 15 depressive disorder, and an insomnia disorder. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 59.) Pursuant to 16 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API