Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Stuckey

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided September 26, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe United States Court for tbe Western District of the Indian Territory; before Justice Louis Sulzbacher, April 16, 1906. Suit by Alonzo J. Farrington against W. L. Stuckey, trustee, and others. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. On February 26, 1906, the plaintiff, appellant here, filed his complaint in equity against W. L. Stuckey, trustee, Wm. Kenefick, Trustee and Wm.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe United States Court for tbe Western District of the Indian Territory; before Justice Louis Sulzbacher, April 16, 1906. Suit by Alonzo J. Farrington against W. L. Stuckey, trustee, and others. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. On February 26, 1906, the plaintiff, appellant here, filed his complaint in equity against W. L. Stuckey, trustee, Wm. Kenefick, Trustee and Wm. Kenefick Company, defendants below appellees here, and alleged that on the 18th day of November, 1904, to secure the payment of two notes of $250 each, and dated the 18th…

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The appellant has filed 14 assignments of error, as follows: “(1) That the court erred in sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. (2) That the court erred in holding that the plaintiff’s complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (3) The court erred in holding that the contract on the part of the defendants with the said trustees, W. B. Hudson, John W. Sullins, and Anthony Crafton, to influence the construction of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad into and through the town of Henryetta, is not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Woodstock Iron Co. v. Richmond & Danville Extension Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bestor v. WathenIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Purcell Mill & Elevator Co. v. Canadian Valley Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Deskin v. StuckeyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907
  5. Hudson v. StuckeyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API