Legal Opinion

Inre: Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 8, 2014No. 2013-1407PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

The Roslin Institute of Edinburgh, Scotland (Roslin) is the assignee of U.S. Patent Application No. 09/225,233 (the '233 application) and appeals from a final decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board). The Board held that all of Roslin’s pending claims — claims 155-159 and 164 — were unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Board also rejected Roslin’s claims as anticipated and obvious under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. We affirm the Board’s rejection of the claims under § 101.

Background

On July 5, 1996, Keith Henry Stockman Campbell and Ian Wilmut…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Genetic Technologies Limited v. Merial L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. University of Utah Research Foundation v. Ambry Genetics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Genetic Technologies Ltd. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  5. Amdocs (Israel) Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API